On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 05:00:44 +0100, "Trimble Bracegirdle"
Post by Trimble BracegirdleHey such negative reactions to the Sainted Memory of what we can
imagine was a 'Greatest PC FPS Ever'
without any of those disappointing sequels to diminish what possibly once
existed.
..some people say..
To my memory of playing these older games, Duke3d was the first game
to succeed in outdoing id in every area, from a far better engine to
the more subtle and better storyline that the better engine allowed.
I don't mean this to be dismissive of the incredible rush when I first
played doom shareware.
http://www.doomworld.com/pageofdoom/shareware.html
I don't think there'll ever be a moment in gaming that'll equal that
rush. There's no question that id dominated the FPS scene for some
time.
Post by Trimble BracegirdleANY Ways ...theres no excuse 'cause we can get a very through upgraded,
rebuilt engine for the game...this one probably the best.
http://www.eduke32.com/
I can't think of any rational reason why a developer or producer would
foist the Duke Forever travesty on us (fans) in lieu of a sequel to
the original Duke. It doesn't make sense to me.
The missed opportunity can't be recaptured.
IMO Jack of Far Cry fame is a true successor of Duke, and Jack is
better in having an ingenious and wierdly optimistic wit. I also like
how the personality of Jack is given depth thru' his relationship with
Val.
I can't understand why Ubisoft gave Far Cry 2 it's name, because it
isn't a sequel to Far Cry. The game has no relationship whatsoever to
Far Cry. The only way I can figure it is that when human beings do
things, not everything makes sense, even when successful.
I would like to see a game come out which is to Far Cry what Far Cry
is to Duke, and what Duke is to Doom. That not being likely, I'd be
happy if there' were a sequel in the same spirit as Far Cry.
Post by Trimble BracegirdleNow don't that beat Crysis ??
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") mouse (Such Nonsense! past his bedtime!)